Mexico City.- Governor Morena demands that the Federal Judicial Council react to the “excesses” of judges who try to stop judicial reform through patronage.
“We consider it unimportant that the Judiciary Council did not immediately take action on this issue in the face of excessive actions of federal judges who violated the Amparo Act in section 61 and who abused their functions, ordering compliance with their illegal and unacceptable actions. resolution. “, they noted in a statement.
“We demand that the Federal Judicial Council take immediate action against judges who violate the Constitution, the laws and regulations derived from it.” Just yesterday Morena’s national leader, Luisa María Alcalde, called on Morena militants to show their support for President Claudia Sheinbaum in the face of the “obstacles” that the judge tried to impose so that she could not hold elections for members of the Judiciary.
Following the call, the signatories expressed their “concern” over the repeated intentions to provide illegal and unacceptable protections to judges of the Federal Judicial Branch, after considering that they went far beyond their authority and violated the basic rules of the constitution.
“On other occasions we have expressed public complaints about what it would mean for judges and ministers to change the Legislature, because the intention to stop a constitutional reform that has been completed and in accordance with the law at all its stages would be anti-hidden. democratic blow. “Now members of the Federal Judicial Branch are ignoring Article 61 of the Amparo Law, which clearly defines inadmissible cases,” they said in a statement.
They warned that judges have powers not granted by law and that they blatantly violate them, especially if they are the ones tasked with administering justice. “Moreover, the federal judge’s resolution in terms of protection against constitutional reform cannot be followed because the decision completely violates: the actions of the reforming state are NOT subject to any of the jurisdictional control mechanisms provided for in the general Constitution, let alone in its organic laws. “As if this were not enough, the judges exceeded their limits by ignoring that a definitive stay cannot be granted against the publication of reforms to the Judiciary in the Official Gazette of the Federation, nor can it be granted. (DOF), Alejandro López González, abolished the publication Judicial reform decree carried out on September 15, Nancy Juárez Salas, Nineteenth District Judge in Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, ruled in an incident, in protection 823/2024, that the federal government failed to comply with the temporary suspension ordering her not to publish the decision in the DOF, three days before its diffusion. The order caused a reaction in the Presidency. Yesterday, the President’s Legal Counsel, Ernestina Godoy, reported that they would report to the Federal Judiciary Council Judge Nancy Juárez who ordered Sheinbaum to eliminate the publication of the Judiciary reform decree went beyond its limits by ordering that the decision to reform the Judiciary be expunged from the Official Gazette of the Federation.
Source link
