That publication from Judicial reform in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF) will not withdraw, as ordered by a district judgeconvince the president Claudia Sheinbaum.
In the morning conference this Friday, he also said that they had not been told to remove the publication.
Instead, Sheinbaum added, a complaint will be filed against Judge Nancy Juárez at the Federal Judicial Council (CJF) for her lack of jurisdiction in the matter.
“The judge does not have the authority to request that the publication be removed, he is not above the Mexican people and because legally he has no basis, and because it was the Legislature that ordered the publication.
You may be interested in: Celebrating the conflict over the protection of judges
“We will not remove the publication and the judge will be reported to the Judiciary Council, but in any case we do not want impunity to remain,” Sheinbaum said.
This is an incident carried out by a judge that has no legal basis and even if the judge is not sanctioned by the CJF, a complaint will still be filed because they must comply with the law.
Meanwhile, the President’s legal advisor, Ernestina Godoy, explained that in the Mexican legal system there is no legal provision that authorizes the Judicial Branch of the Federation to question, review or cancel the work of the body that reviews the Constitution. .
The regulation, he stressed, stipulates the inadmissibility of amparo trials that conflict with Constitutional reform, so that “the court cannot have the authority to review constitutional reform.”
“This means placing oneself above the review body, establishing oneself as the highest authority in the Mexican State and ignoring the postulate of the Constituent Assembly which stated that national sovereignty rests with the people and not with the District Courts.
You may be interested: García Luna has three valid arrest warrants in Mexico: Segob
“The actions of these judges usurped the powers granted to the reform powers; They intend to suspend procedures that violate federal agreements. “The decisions of the two countries must not conflict with the provisions given to the Mexican people,” Godoy said.
He added that it was unreasonable for a district judge to intend to intervene and limit the constitutional authority of Congress, if not other than the state congresses that are part of the Permanent Constituency.
CSAS
