For example, ministers may consider whether they can phase out certain programs to save money. There may also be unnecessary subsidies that the government could abolish. Although implementing organizations initially stayed out of the picture, Heinen has also given ministers the space to make cuts to implementing organizations if savings can be achieved relatively easily.
Heinen believes that the intervention proposed in the coalition agreement is defensible. He stresses that employers should check every day whether cost reductions are necessary. “The government does not have that natural incentive.” The minister also points out that there have been no targeted cuts in public staff for many years. “So I don’t think it’s surprising that they say in 2024, guys, let’s reconsider: can’t it be done a little more efficiently?”
The aim of saving 22 percent is still ambitious. “You really have to think a bit,” admits Heinen, but the goal is not unattainable. The Finance Minister once again emphasises that the measure was not taken “out of spite towards civil servants”. The minister is very impressed with the work of his ministry’s staff.
